Skip to content
SlateIndex
SigNozThe Open Source Datadog Alternative
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

SigNoz vs Tempo

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SigNoz is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 7.1 for Tempo, and ranks ahead in 55% of the answers that name both.

Choose SigNoz if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 7.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 6% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA coverage
  • Cost-effective open-source alternative to Datadog and New Relic

Choose Tempo if…

  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Open-source and cost-effective
  • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric SigNoz Tempo
Visibility score12.3%7.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#10#12
Share of voice3.7%3.1%
Mentions this run2218
Positive in AI answers44%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3SigNoz 12%

SigNoz 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SigNoz leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
16.1%
8%
AI Mode
7.6%
11.5%
Perplexity
13.2%
1.9%
SigNozTempo

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

6SigNoz ranked higher
5Tempo ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSigNozTempo
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry price$49 / mo—
Free planNo—
DeploymentSigNoz Cloud (managed, with US, EU and India regions), bring-your-own-cloud, or self-hostedManaged as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, HIPAASOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2
SupportCommunity support on Slack, Email support, In-product chat support, Dedicated Slack, email and in-product support on Enterprise plans—
Founded2020—
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CANew York, NY
Employees11–501,001–5,000
FundingUnnamed round after Y Combinator participation · $7M raisedSeries E · $1100M raised
Best forFast-scaling engineering teams that want usage-based pricing, and solo developers and small startups that want to self-host.—

Plans side by side

SigNoz

Community (Self-Hosted)Customself-hosted
Teams (SigNoz Cloud)$49month
Enterprise$4,000month, starts at
SigNoz pricing

Tempo

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

SigNoz

  • Cost-effective open-source alternative to Datadog and New Relic
  • Native OpenTelemetry observability platform
  • Free self-hosting and data ownership
  • Transparent, predictable pricing
  • Good fit for startups and engineering teams
  • Narrower integrations than broadest competitors
  • Requires engineering time to run

Tempo

  • Open-source and cost-effective
  • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
  • Distributed tracing for traces
  • Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
  • Managed option with a permanent free tier
  • Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “SigNoz vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/signoz-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.