Skip to content
SlateIndex
GrafanaFull-stack observability for the agentic era
vs
SigNozThe Open Source Datadog Alternative
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Grafana vs SigNoz

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Grafana is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.8 versus 12.3 for SigNoz, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.

Choose Grafana if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.8 vs 12.3)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 44% positive)
  • You need FedRAMP or NATSEC100 or PCI DSS or GDPR or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR coverage

Choose SigNoz if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need HIPAA coverage
  • Cost-effective open-source alternative to Datadog and New Relic
  • Native OpenTelemetry observability platform

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Grafana SigNoz
Visibility score47.8%12.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#2#10
Share of voice9.8%3.7%
Mentions this run5822
Positive in AI answers46%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Grafana 48%

Grafana 0pp · SigNoz 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Grafana leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
57%
16.1%
AI Mode
43.1%
7.6%
Perplexity
43.1%
13.2%
GrafanaSigNoz

Head to head in AI answers

22 engine answers name both brands

19Grafana ranked higher
3SigNoz ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGrafanaSigNoz
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $19 / mo$49 / mo
Free planYesNo
DeploymentFully managed Grafana Cloud on Public Cloud, Federal Cloud or Bring Your Own Cloud, plus self-managed Grafana EnterpriseSigNoz Cloud (managed, with US, EU and India regions), bring-your-own-cloud, or self-hosted
ComplianceFedRAMP, NATSEC100, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, CSA STARSOC 2 Type II, HIPAA
SupportCommunity support (Free plan), 8x5 email support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan)Community support on Slack, Email support, In-product chat support, Dedicated Slack, email and in-product support on Enterprise plans
Founded20142020
HeadquartersNew York, NYSan Francisco, CA
Employees1,001–5,00011–50
FundingSeries E · $1100M raisedUnnamed round after Y Combinator participation · $7M raised
Best forTeams that want open-standard observability without lock-in, from startups to Fortune 500 enterprisesFast-scaling engineering teams that want usage-based pricing, and solo developers and small startups that want to self-host.

Plans side by side

Grafana

Free$0month
Pro$19month + usage
Enterprise$25,000year spend commit (starting)
Grafana pricing

SigNoz

Community (Self-Hosted)Customself-hosted
Teams (SigNoz Cloud)$49month
Enterprise$4,000month, starts at
SigNoz pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Grafana

  • Permanent free tier
  • Open, composable, flexible platform
  • Strong open-source, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support
  • Cost-effective, good value
  • Managed hosting
  • Complex multi-dimensional usage-based billing
  • Self-hosting demands significant engineering maintenance
  • Capped free-tier limits

SigNoz

  • Cost-effective open-source alternative to Datadog and New Relic
  • Native OpenTelemetry observability platform
  • Free self-hosting and data ownership
  • Transparent, predictable pricing
  • Good fit for startups and engineering teams
  • Narrower integrations than broadest competitors
  • Requires engineering time to run

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Grafana vs SigNoz”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/grafana-vs-signoz, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.