SilverfortRuntime identity security for AI, AD and cloud
vs
WorkOSYour app, Enterprise Ready.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Silverfort vs WorkOS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 0 for Silverfort.
Choose Silverfort if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose WorkOS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or SOC 3 or SIG Lite coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Silverfort | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 9.5% |
| Change vs last week | no change0% | down−1.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #37 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Silverfort 0pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
WorkOS leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SilverfortWorkOS
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Silverfort ranked higher
0WorkOS ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Silverfort | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | On-prem, cloud and hybrid | Cloud APIs and SDKs |
| Integrations | — | 20+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite |
| Support | Standard support (included), Premier support, Diamond support, Expert Services | Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Plano, Texas, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $222M raised | Seed · $195M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises with Active Directory, legacy and hybrid environments that need to protect human, service-account and AI agent identities | SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Silverfort
Profile in progress.
WorkOS
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
- Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
- Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
- Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
- Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Silverfort vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/silverfort-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.