Skip to content
SlateIndex
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
vs
WorkOSYour app, Enterprise Ready.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Okta vs WorkOS

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 9.5 for WorkOS, and ranks ahead in 73% of the answers that name both.

Choose Okta if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 9.5)
  • You need more native integrations (8000+ vs 20+)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose WorkOS if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 39% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or SOC 3 or SIG Lite coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Okta WorkOS
Visibility score56.9%9.5%
Change vs last weekdown−0.9%down−1.3%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#2#11
Share of voice12.2%3%
Mentions this run3810
Positive in AI answers39%56%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Okta 57%

Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
68.4%
4.5%
AI Mode
60%
6.3%
Perplexity
53.9%
12.8%
OktaWorkOS

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

8Okta ranked higher
3WorkOS ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOktaWorkOS
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry price$6 per seat / moContact sales
Free planNo · 30-day trialYes
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)Cloud APIs and SDKs
Integrations8000+20+
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite
SupportOnline support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success PlansEmail support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls
Founded20092019
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees5,000+51–200
FundingIPOSeed · $195M raised
Best forOrganizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations.

Plans side by side

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

WorkOS

Pay as you go$0month, usage-based
Annual CreditsCustomcontact sales
WorkOS pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Okta

  • Market-leading IAM platform
  • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
  • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
  • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
  • Strong security effectiveness

    WorkOS

    • Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
    • Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
    • Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
    • Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
    • Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
    • Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.