Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
vs
WarpOpen infrastructure for cloud software factories
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Sourcegraph Cody vs Warp
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 1.2 for Warp.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 1.2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Warp if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Sourcegraph Cody | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #12 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 3.3% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 16 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Sourcegraph Cody 0pp · Warp 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Sourcegraph CodyWarp
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher
0Warp ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Sourcegraph Cody | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $16,000 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments | Desktop apps plus Warp's cloud, with an option to self-host in your own VPC |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support | Private email support, Dedicated account manager and shared Slack channel (Enterprise), White-glove onboarding (Enterprise) |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | New York, NY |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Later-stage deal · $225M raised | Seed · $73M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases | Engineering teams that run AI coding agents across the terminal and cloud and want control over models and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Warp
Free$0month
Build$20month
Max$200month
Business$50per user per month, up to 25 seats
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Warp
- best for power users
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Sourcegraph Cody vs Warp”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/sourcegraph-cody-vs-warp, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.