Stytch vs WorkOS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 2.1 for Stytch, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Stytch if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA/BAA or PCI DSS (SAQ-A) coverage
- Good choice for a rapid MVP
- API-first platform with flexible building blocks
- Suits both consumer and B2B authentication
Choose WorkOS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 2.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 43% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or SOC 3 or SIG Lite coverage
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Stytch | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.1% | 9.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | down−1.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #25 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Stytch −0.19999999999999973pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
WorkOS leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Stytch | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #6 | #3 |
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #6 | #1 |
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #4 | #1 |
| Best identity and access management platform for startups | Perplexity | #8 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Stytch | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud APIs and SDKs |
| Integrations | — | 20+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA/BAA, PCI DSS (SAQ-A) | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite |
| Support | Email support, Community Slack, Dedicated Slack channel (Enterprise), Enterprise support SLA | Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B | Seed · $195M raised |
| Best for | Developer teams building B2B SaaS or consumer apps that need enterprise-ready auth and AI agent authentication | SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Stytch
- Good choice for a rapid MVP
- API-first platform with flexible building blocks
- Suits both consumer and B2B authentication
- Strong shortlist option for B2B SaaS
WorkOS
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
- Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
- Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
- Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
- Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Stytch vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/stytch-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.