Transmit SecurityCustomer identity and access management with fraud prevention in one platform
vs
WorkOSYour app, Enterprise Ready.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Transmit Security vs WorkOS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 0.7 for Transmit Security.
Choose Transmit Security if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
Choose WorkOS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 0.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 50% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or SOC 3 or SIG Lite coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Transmit Security | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 9.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.1% | down−1.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #33 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Transmit Security 0pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
WorkOS leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Transmit SecurityWorkOS
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Transmit Security ranked higher
0WorkOS ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Transmit Security | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $50,000 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS | Cloud APIs and SDKs |
| Integrations | — | 20+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite |
| Support | Enterprise SLA with premium support | Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A · $543M raised | Seed · $195M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises such as banks and insurers needing combined customer identity and fraud prevention | SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations. |
Plans side by side
Transmit Security
Full Mosaic Platform$200,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity$100,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Fraud and Threat Detection and Response$100,000year for 10M Logins (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Verification$50,000year for 100K ID Checks (starting at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Transmit Security
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
- Noted by Gartner for specialized fraud prevention and CIAM architectures
WorkOS
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
- Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
- Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
- Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
- Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Transmit Security vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/transmit-security-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.