Skip to content
SlateIndex
TwentyThe #1 Open Source CRM for modern teams.
vs
WoodpeckerCold email and LinkedIn outreach with high deliverability
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3

Twenty vs Woodpecker

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Woodpecker is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 0 for Twenty.

Choose Twenty if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

Choose Woodpecker if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 0)
  • You need GDPR 100% compliant (vendor claim) or CCPA 100% compliant (vendor claim) or ISO certified storage or CASA certified: tier 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Twenty Woodpecker
Visibility score0%3.6%
Change vs last weekno change0%up+2.1%
Rank in Sales Engagement#58#21
Share of voice0%0.6%
Mentions this run04
Positive in AI answers—0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Twenty 0%

Twenty 0pp · Woodpecker +2.1pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Woodpecker leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
3.7%
AI Mode
0%
0.9%
Perplexity
0%
6.3%
TwentyWoodpecker

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Twenty ranked higher
0Woodpecker ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionTwentyWoodpecker
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $9 per seat / moContact sales
Free planYesNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentSelf-hosted or managed cloudSaaS
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IIGDPR 100% compliant (vendor claim), CCPA 100% compliant (vendor claim), ISO certified storage, CASA certified: tier 2
SupportCommunity, Email and chat, Priority support, Dedicated support and SLAChat in the bottom right corner of the app, Book a call, Answers to questions within hours
Founded20232015
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesWroclaw, Poland
Employees1–1051–200
FundingSeries B · $105M raisedPre-seed agreement with Xevin Lab (amount not stated) · $0M raised
Best forTechnical teams that want a custom CRM they can own, extend with code and adapt as the business grows.Businesses that do outbound, including B2B sales teams, SaaS businesses and marketing or lead generation agencies

Plans side by side

Twenty

Pro$9user/month
Organization$39user/month
Enterprise$50,000year (starting from)
Twenty pricing

Woodpecker

EmailCustommonth
MultichannelCustommonth
LinkedInCustommonth
ScaleCustomcustom
Woodpecker pricing

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Twenty vs Woodpecker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/twenty-vs-woodpecker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.