UiPath vs Zoho
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Zoho is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose UiPath if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
Choose Zoho if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 2.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 38% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | UiPath | Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.4% | 15.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.8% | up+1.7% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #33 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 3.9% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 24 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp · Zoho +1.6999999999999993pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Zoho leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | UiPath | Zoho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #5 | #3 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | UiPath | Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum | — |
| Founded | 2005 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform | Businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR |
Plans side by side
UiPath
Zoho
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Zoho
- Strong value for money and low cost
- Free tier for small teams
- Broad functionality and integrated app ecosystem
- Good customization options
- Scales well as businesses grow
- Less premium user experience
- Pricing varies dramatically across products
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “UiPath vs Zoho”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/uipath-vs-zoho, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.