Who each engine recommends
Position of every brand named in the latest run.
| Brand | ChatGPT | Perplexity | AI Mode | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avatier | — | — | #1 | |
| OktaTop pick | #1 | — | — | |
| Microsoft Entra ID | #2 | — | — | |
| Google Cloud Identity | #3 | — | — | |
| Ping Identity | #4 | — | — | |
| SailPoint | #5 | — | — | |
| CyberArk | #6 | — | — | |
| Microsoft Entra External ID | #7 | — | — |
Mention rate over time
Share of engines naming each brand, weekly over the last 60 days (up to 8 brands).
Okta is named by 33% of engines today.
Responses
What each engine answered, and how the shortlist moved.
Identity & Access Management (IAM) software is typically priced using a subscription model based on the number of users, identities, or managed resources. Most vendors charge monthly or annually, with pricing varying according to the features, security capabilities, deployment model, and organization size. There are several common pricing models in the IAM market. Common IAM pricing models ---------------------------- Pricing model How it works Typical use case --- --- --- Per-user pricing…
- Okta — If you're building a business case, I can also help develop an IAM pricing benchmark and financial model comparing Okta, Microsoft Entra, Ping Identity, SailPoint, and CyberArk. ↑ 1 vs last week
- Microsoft Entra ID ↓ 1 vs last week
- Google Cloud Identity New this week
- Ping Identity — If you're building a business case, I can also help develop an IAM pricing benchmark and financial model comparing Okta, Microsoft Entra, Ping Identity, SailPoint, and CyberArk. ↓ 1 vs last week
- SailPoint — If you're building a business case, I can also help develop an IAM pricing benchmark and financial model comparing Okta, Microsoft Entra, Ping Identity, SailPoint, and CyberArk. New this week
- CyberArk — If you're building a business case, I can also help develop an IAM pricing benchmark and financial model comparing Okta, Microsoft Entra, Ping Identity, SailPoint, and CyberArk. New this week
IAM software is typically priced as a recurring subscription, most often per user per month. Basic SSO and MFA commonly start around $2–$5 per user/month, while broader packages with lifecycle management, governance, and advanced security often run $6–$15 per user/month. Common pricing models include: Per named user: A fee for each employee, contractor, or administrator; the most common workforce-IAM model. Tiered per-user plans: Higher tiers add capabilities such as adaptive authentication,…
- Avatier — Identity & Access Management (IAM) software typically utilizes a mix of pricing models depending on whether the solution is delivered as a cloud-based SaaS platform, an on-premises infrastructure, or a consumption-heavy… New this week
Dropped from this engine’s shortlist this week: Okta, Microsoft Entra ID
Citations
Sources the engines cited for this prompt.
| Source | Type | Citations | Cited by |
|---|---|---|---|
| costbench.com | Web | 4 | ChatGPT, Perplexity |
| ciopages.com | Web | 2 | ChatGPT |
| google.com | Web | 2 | ChatGPT |
| alibabacloud.com | Web | 1 | ChatGPT |
| a-listware.com | Web | 1 | Perplexity |
| avatier.com | Brand site · Avatier | 1 | Google AI Mode |
| c1.ai | Web | 1 | Perplexity |
| capterra.com | Review site | 1 | Perplexity |
| comparedge.com | Web | 1 | Perplexity |
| expertinsights.com | Web | 1 | Perplexity |
| idppricing.com | Web | 1 | ChatGPT |
| isvcosell.com | Web | 1 | ChatGPT |
| itcommons.com | Web | 1 | ChatGPT |
| leadchangegroup.com | Web | 1 | Perplexity |
| microsoft.com | Brand site · Microsoft Entra ID | 1 | ChatGPT |
| okta.com | Brand site · Okta | 1 | ChatGPT |
| pingidentity.com | Brand site · Ping Identity | 1 | ChatGPT |
| rankite.com | Web | 1 | ChatGPT |
| securityboulevard.com | Web | 1 | Perplexity |
| thalesgroup.com | Web | 1 | ChatGPT |
| vendorbenchmark.com | Web | 1 | Perplexity |