ActiveCampaign vs Bloomreach
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
ActiveCampaign is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 44 versus 1.9 for Bloomreach, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose ActiveCampaign if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (44 vs 1.9)
- You need more native integrations (1000+ vs 175+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA coverage
Choose Bloomreach if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 9001 or ISO 22301 or CCPA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 44% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #2 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 9.3% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 51 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ActiveCampaign 0pp · Bloomreach 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
ActiveCampaign leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | ActiveCampaign | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #5 | #18 |
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | Perplexity | #4 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ActiveCampaign | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Onboarding fee | Included | — |
| Integrations | 1000+ | 175+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 22301, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Help center, FAQs, Support request form, Dedicated account team on Enterprise plan | In-app chat with a 90-second average response, 24/7, Named Customer Success Manager, Bloomreach Academy, Monthly best-practice sessions |
| Founded | 2003 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | Mountain View, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $360M raised | Series D, from Bain Capital Ventures, Battery Ventures, Lightspeed, NEA and Salesforce Ventures |
| Best for | Small teams and growing businesses that want AI to run everyday email, SMS and WhatsApp marketing | Brands at scale that send high volumes of email and SMS, run ecommerce, and hold customer data spread across systems. Most customers invest $60K or more a year. |
Plans side by side
ActiveCampaign
Bloomreach
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ActiveCampaign
- advanced marketing automation
- deep CRM integration
- behavioral and lifecycle automation
- strong email marketing platform
- affordable pricing with annual discount
- charges for total stored prospect records
Bloomreach
- included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ActiveCampaign vs Bloomreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activecampaign-vs-bloomreach, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.