Agiloft vs Oneflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Oneflow is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 16.1 versus 3.4 for Agiloft, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Agiloft if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 32% positive)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO 27701 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
Choose Oneflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.1 vs 3.4)
- You need ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Agiloft | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.4% | 16.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #22 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 4.9% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 32% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agiloft 0pp · Oneflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Oneflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Agiloft | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #9 | #6 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #8 | #12 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | AI Mode | #6 | #4 |
| Is Agiloft a good proposal and contract tool? | Perplexity | #1 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agiloft | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Hosted service on AWS, with redundant infrastructure inside or outside the USA | SaaS |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1 |
| Support | Professional Services and Training, Technical Support, Customer Success, Agiloft University | Dedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tier |
| Founded | 1991 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California, US | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Strategic investment, KKR | Private investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias Ståhlgren |
| Best for | Enterprise legal, procurement and sales teams that need to tailor contract workflows without code | Teams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contracts |
Plans side by side
Oneflow
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agiloft
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
- Strong fit for mid-market and enterprise complex approval, compliance, and renewal needs
Oneflow
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
- Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
- Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
- Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
- Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
- Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agiloft vs Oneflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agiloft-vs-oneflow, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.