Agiloft vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Agiloft is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.4 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Agiloft if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.4 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 coverage
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Agiloft | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.4% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #22 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agiloft 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Agiloft leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Agiloft | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #5 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agiloft | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Hosted service on AWS, with redundant infrastructure inside or outside the USA | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Professional Services and Training, Technical Support, Customer Success, Agiloft University | — |
| Founded | 1991 | — |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California, US | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Strategic investment, KKR | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise legal, procurement and sales teams that need to tailor contract workflows without code | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Plans side by side
Upland Qvidian
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agiloft
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
- Strong fit for mid-market and enterprise complex approval, compliance, and renewal needs
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agiloft vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agiloft-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.