Agorapulse vs HubSpot
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Social Media Management: it has a visibility score of 21.7 versus 16 for Agorapulse, and ranks ahead in 30% of the answers that name both.
Choose Agorapulse if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 35% positive)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or GDPR coverage
- Robust unified inbox for comments, DMs, and mentions
- Reliable scheduling tools
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.7 vs 16)
- You need SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Agorapulse | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16% | 21.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Social Media Management | #9 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 4.6% | 5.7% |
| Mentions this run | 27 | 33 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 35% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agorapulse 0pp · HubSpot 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
10 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Agorapulse | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a social media management tool for a mid-market team? | AI Mode | #5 | #1 |
| How do I choose a social media management tool for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #4 | #10 |
| What are the best Social Media Management tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #6 | #7 |
| What are the best Social Media Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #6 | #14 |
| Top social media management tool options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #5 | #2 |
| Top social media management tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #4 | #7 |
| Best social media management tool for startups | Perplexity | #4 | #9 |
| Compare the leading Social Media Management platforms | Perplexity | #4 | #14 |
| Which Social Media Management vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #12 |
| Official website of the top social media management tool vendors | Perplexity | #7 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agorapulse | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | — | $3,000 |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS | Cloud |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Support team with an average response time of 30 minutes or less | Phone |
| Founded | 2010 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B, led by Hi Inov Dentressangle with Cipio Partners and Entrepreneur Venture | Corporate round |
| Best for | Social media managers, marketing leaders and agencies that need to prove social media's business results | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. |
Plans side by side
Agorapulse
Pricing not available.
HubSpot
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agorapulse
- Robust unified inbox for comments, DMs, and mentions
- Reliable scheduling tools
- Strong agency and team collaboration, including task assignment and approvals
- Clear ROI and client reporting
- Approachable price compared with Sprout Social
- Not as strong as Sprout Social for sophisticated community management
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agorapulse vs HubSpot”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agorapulse-vs-hubspot, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.