AhrefsMake your business discoverable, in search, AI, and beyond.
vs
ContentsquareAI-first experience platform for every human and agent journey
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Ahrefs vs Contentsquare
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Contentsquare is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 1.7 for Ahrefs.
Choose Ahrefs if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29 vs $49)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Contentsquare if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 1.7)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Ahrefs | Contentsquare |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.7% | 6.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #27 | #14 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ahrefs 0pp · Contentsquare 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Contentsquare leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AhrefsContentsquare
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ahrefs ranked higher
0Contentsquare ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ahrefs | Contentsquare |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29 / mo | Free; paid from $49 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS | — |
| Integrations | — | 115+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015 |
| Support | Customer support five days a week, Academy courses and certification, Webinars and AMAs, YouTube tutorials | AI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Paris, France |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series F |
| Best for | Freelance SEOs, marketing consultants, and lean in-house marketing teams, from small businesses to Fortune 500 teams. | Digital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams. |
Plans side by side
Ahrefs
Ahrefs Free$0month
Starter$29month
Lite$129month
Standard$249month
Advanced$449month
Enterprise$1,499month, annual commitment required
Contentsquare
Free$0forever (up to 200k monthly sessions)
Growth$49month (from 7k monthly sessions; $39/month billed yearly)
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ahrefs
- Strong backlink analysis and index
- Strong competitor research
- Honest, transparent pricing
- Deep technical site audits
- Free Webmaster Tools tier for verified site owners
- High monthly cost, especially for smaller budgets
- Seat-based pricing needs careful evaluation against team size
Contentsquare
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
- Session replay and UX friction insights
- Strong G2 rating from many reviews
- Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
- Free tier available for small projects
- Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ahrefs vs Contentsquare”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ahrefs-vs-contentsquare, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.