AhrefsMake your business discoverable, in search, AI, and beyond.
vs
WhitesparkWhitespark offers complete local SEO solutions, from industry-leading software to expert managed services.
Comparison · SEO Tools · weekly run Nov 2
Ahrefs vs Whitespark
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ahrefs is the stronger AI pick in SEO Tools: it has a visibility score of 56 versus 0 for Whitespark, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Ahrefs if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
Choose Whitespark if…
- You want a lower entry price ($1 vs $29)
- Strong citation building and management for local SEO
- Location-specific local rank tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Ahrefs | Whitespark |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 56% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in SEO Tools | #2 | #56 |
| Share of voice | 12% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 61 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ahrefs 0pp · Whitespark 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ahrefs leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AhrefsWhitespark
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Ahrefs ranked higher
1Whitespark ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Ahrefs | Whitespark |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the pros and cons of Whitespark? | Perplexity | #4 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ahrefs | Whitespark |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29 / mo | $1 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS | SaaS |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | — |
| Support | Customer support five days a week, Academy courses and certification, Webinars and AMAs, YouTube tutorials | Help center, Email support@whitespark.ca, Phone 1 (855) 406-6050 |
| Founded | 2010 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Edmonton, Alberta, Canada |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | — |
| Best for | Freelance SEOs, marketing consultants, and lean in-house marketing teams, from small businesses to Fortune 500 teams. | Small businesses, agencies, freelancers, multi-location enterprises, and anyone doing local SEO. |
Plans side by side
Ahrefs
Ahrefs Free$0month
Starter$29month
Lite$129month
Standard$249month
Advanced$449month
Enterprise$1,499month, annual commitment required
Whitespark
Local Platform$1per month, per location
Local Ranking Grids$10month (starting at)
Local Rank Tracker$14month (ranging to $200/month)
Local Citation Finder$33month (ranging to $149/month)
Reputation Builder$79per month, per location
SEO Services$499month (ranging to $1,999/month)
Listings Service$20one-time (packages ranging to $999)
Yext Replacement Service$399per location (one-time fee)
Enterprise ServicesCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ahrefs
- Strong backlink analysis and index
- Strong competitor research
- Honest, transparent pricing
- Deep technical site audits
- Free Webmaster Tools tier for verified site owners
- High monthly cost, especially for smaller budgets
- Seat-based pricing needs careful evaluation against team size
Whitespark
- Strong citation building and management for local SEO
- Location-specific local rank tracking
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ahrefs vs Whitespark”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ahrefs-vs-whitespark, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.