Skip to content
SlateIndex
AmazingHiringHire Hidden Tech Talent 50% Faster
vs
Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

AmazingHiring vs Ceipal ATS

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Ceipal ATS is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0.3 for AmazingHiring.

Choose AmazingHiring if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

Choose Ceipal ATS if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric AmazingHiring Ceipal ATS
Visibility score0.3%1.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#66#50
Share of voice0.2%0.3%
Mentions this run12
Positive in AI answers0%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3AmazingHiring 0%

AmazingHiring 0pp · Ceipal ATS 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Ceipal ATS leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
4.1%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0%
0%
AmazingHiringCeipal ATS

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0AmazingHiring ranked higher
0Ceipal ATS ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAmazingHiringCeipal ATS
DeploymentWeb, Android and iPhone/iPad—
Compliance—SOC 2
Support—Dedicated support
Founded20132015
HeadquartersRedwood City, CaliforniaRochester, NY
Employees11–50201–500
FundingAngelSeries B
Best forTech recruiters and talent acquisition teams filling hard-to-hire technical rolesHealthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teams

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “AmazingHiring vs Ceipal ATS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazinghiring-vs-ceipal-ats, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.