AmazingHiringHire Hidden Tech Talent 50% Faster
vs
HiredRecruiting
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
AmazingHiring vs Hired
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.3 for AmazingHiring.
Choose AmazingHiring if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.3)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AmazingHiring | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #66 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AmazingHiring 0pp · Hired 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AmazingHiringHired
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AmazingHiring ranked higher
0Hired ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AmazingHiring | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Web, Android and iPhone/iPad | — |
| Founded | 2013 | — |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) |
| Employees | 11–50 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Angel | Series D · $133M raised |
| Best for | Tech recruiters and talent acquisition teams filling hard-to-hire technical roles | Employers hiring tech and sales talent |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AmazingHiring vs Hired”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazinghiring-vs-hired, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.