Skip to content
SlateIndex
AnchorGet Paid on Autopilot
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Anchor vs Qwilr

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 1.1 for Anchor, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Anchor if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Highly rated by niche service providers

Choose Qwilr if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 1.1)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
  • Interactive, web-based proposals

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Anchor Qwilr
Visibility score1.1%28.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#35#4
Share of voice0.2%7.2%
Mentions this run137
Positive in AI answers—51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Anchor 1%

Anchor 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
30.2%
AI Mode
3.1%
26.9%
Perplexity
0%
27.8%
AnchorQwilr

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Anchor ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAnchorQwilr
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry priceContact sales$35 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud-based platformWeb-based, web-native software
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS
SupportPersonal human support, Dedicated account manager, Technical support anytime, anywhere, Searchable help center in-chatEmail support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions
Founded20212014
HeadquartersNew York, NY, United StatesRedfern, New South Wales, Australia
Employees51–20051–200
FundingSeries A · $35M raisedSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised
Best forAccounting and bookkeeping firms and other professional services businesses that bill clients on agreementsSales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.

Plans side by side

Anchor

Anchor$0month (no subscription fee)
Anchor pricing

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Anchor

  • Highly rated by niche service providers

    Qwilr

    • Interactive, web-based proposals
    • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
    • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
    • Lower cost with annual billing
    • 14-day free trial available

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Anchor vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/anchor-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.