Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppfarmBuild custom software without becoming a software company.
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Appfarm vs Claris FileMaker

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Appfarm is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.

Choose Appfarm if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 1.6)
  • You need ISO 27001 coverage
  • Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes

Choose Claris FileMaker if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appfarm Claris FileMaker
Visibility score4.6%1.6%
Change vs last weekdown−0.7%New
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#23#37
Share of voice1.9%0.3%
Mentions this run112
Positive in AI answers0%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Appfarm 5%

Appfarm −0.8000000000000007pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Appfarm leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
1.1%
AI Mode
2.8%
0%
Perplexity
10.2%
3.7%
AppfarmClaris FileMaker

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Appfarm ranked higher
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppfarmClaris FileMaker
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$22 per seat / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentManaged cloudCloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server)
ComplianceISO 27001SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018
SupportCommunity, Email, Service managerTechnical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums
Founded20182019
HeadquartersOslo, NorwaySunnyvale, California
Employees51–200201–500
FundingCapital increase led by Idékapital, with Eviny Ventures and Arkwright X · $6M raisedLater Stage VC · $1M raised
Best forOperations teams that need governed operational apps without a dedicated development teamTeams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises

Plans side by side

Appfarm

Pricing not available.

Claris FileMaker

Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Claris FileMaker pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Appfarm

  • Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes

    Claris FileMaker

    Profile in progress.

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appfarm vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appfarm-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.