Claris FileMaker vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Quickbase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
Choose Quickbase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 1.6)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Quickbase leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Claris FileMaker | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #7 | #4 |
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #1 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | 2019 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Funding round |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.