Claris FileMaker vs Microsoft Power Apps
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 1.6)
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 55.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+0.2% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 9.8% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Claris FileMaker | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #7 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community |
| Founded | 2019 | — |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Redmond, Washington |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | — |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Microsoft Power Apps
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Microsoft Power Apps”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-microsoft-power-apps, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.