Claris FileMaker alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Claris FileMaker
QuickbaseBest forBusiness teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code.100% of Claris FileMaker answersMicrosoft Power AppsBest forOrganizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together50% of Claris FileMaker answersZohoBest forBusinesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR50% of Claris FileMaker answersOutSystemsBest forRegulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust50% of Claris FileMaker answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Claris FileMaker has a visibility score of 1.6 in Low-Code & No-Code, #37 of 43. AI answers that name Claris FileMaker most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quickbase | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. | — | 4% | Quickbase describes itself as the first application platform built for dynamic work. |
| Microsoft Power Apps | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together | — | 55.6% | Business users and pro developers collaborate in one workspace, combining low code with custom code and connectors |
| Zoho | Businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR | — | 44.8% | A broad suite of 60+ in-house products on a technology stack and data centers Zoho owns, with no ad-based revenue |
| OutSystems | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Contact sales | 40.2% | Governed AI development on a low-code foundation that works with any coding agent |
Alternative 1
Quickbase vs Claris FileMaker →Quickbase
Quickbase suits business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 4% visibility score · #25 in Low-Code & No-Code
- 40+ native integrations
Key features
- Quickbase — No-code platform for building custom apps for complex projects and processes.
- Pave — AI app builder that creates connected, secured custom software from a text prompt.
- Quickbase Pipelines — Visual builder that automates workflows across Quickbase apps and third-party tools using integration channels.
- FastField — Mobile field service app for real-time updates, forms and dispatch, now joined with Quickbase.
Quickbase vs Claris FileMaker
| Dimension | Quickbase | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 1.6% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Cons
Microsoft Power Apps suits organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 55.6% visibility score · #1 in Low-Code & No-Code
Key features
- Power Apps — Low-code app builder for custom business apps, built with drag and drop, generative AI or custom code and deployed across web and mobile.
- Code apps in Power Apps — Apps built by pro developers with custom code on the Power Apps platform, generally available since February 2026.
Microsoft Power Apps vs Claris FileMaker
| Dimension | Microsoft Power Apps | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 55.6% | 1.6% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
Cons
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Alternative 3
Zoho vs Claris FileMaker →Zoho
Zoho suits businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 44.8% visibility score · #3 in CRM
Key features
- Zoho CRM — Manage sales, marketing and support in one CRM platform.
- Zoho Desk — Customer service software for support teams.
- Zoho Creator — Low-code platform to build custom business apps.
- Zoho One — Unified suite of 50+ business applications.
Zoho vs Claris FileMaker
| Dimension | Zoho | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 44.8% | 1.6% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong value for money and low cost
- Free tier for small teams
- Broad functionality and integrated app ecosystem
- Good customization options
- Scales well as businesses grow
Cons
- Less premium user experience
- Pricing varies dramatically across products
Alternative 4
OutSystems vs Claris FileMaker →OutSystems
OutSystems suits regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust.
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- Free plan available
- 40.2% visibility score · #2 in Low-Code & No-Code
- 400+ native integrations
Key features
- OutSystems Agentic Systems Platform — Platform for building, orchestrating and governing AI agents, apps and workflows.
- OutSystems Agent Workbench — Tool for creating custom agents with guardrails, evaluations, monitoring and swappable LLMs.
- OutSystems Personal Edition — No-cost edition for learning and exploring the platform.
OutSystems vs Claris FileMaker
| Dimension | OutSystems | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 40.2% | 1.6% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Trial | Free plan available | — |
Pros
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
Cons
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Claris FileMaker | Per seat | $22 per seat / mo |
| Quickbase | — | — |
| Microsoft Power Apps | — | — |
| Zoho | — | — |
| OutSystems | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Claris FileMaker in the latest weekly run.