AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
n8nFlexible AI workflow automation for technical teams.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Appian vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appian is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 19.6 versus 1.3 for n8n, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appian if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.6 vs 1.3)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
Choose n8n if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 38% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need GDPR coverage
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.6% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | down−1.6% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #6 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 31 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian −1pp · n8n −1.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appian leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Appiann8n
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Appian ranked higher
0n8n ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Appian | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best low-code platform with AI features | Perplexity | #5 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 1999 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-n8n, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.