AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
RasaBuild agents your company brags about
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Appian vs Rasa
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rasa is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 0.3 for Appian.
Choose Appian if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
Choose Rasa if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 0.3)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #71 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian 0pp · Rasa 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rasa leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppianRasa
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Appian ranked higher
0Rasa ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Self-managed on-premises or private cloud, or managed service |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | — |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Free community support in the forum, Basic support via online portal with best-effort response during business hours, Premium Support with 24/7/365 response, Customer Success Manager and business reviews |
| Founded | 1999 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Series C · $70M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Product teams in regulated enterprises that want engineers and business teams to build customer-facing AI agents on one codebase |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Rasa
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Rasa”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-rasa, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.