ApplicantStackThe affordable, easy-to-use online applicant tracking system and employee onboarding system.
vs
hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
ApplicantStack vs hireEZ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
hireEZ is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2.5 versus 1.4 for ApplicantStack.
Choose ApplicantStack if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29.99 vs $494)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Choose hireEZ if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.5 vs 1.4)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ApplicantStack | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 2.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #49 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ApplicantStack 0pp · hireEZ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
hireEZ leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApplicantStackhireEZ
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ApplicantStack ranked higher
0hireEZ ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ApplicantStack | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $29.99 / mo | $494 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Online, with no software installation required | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Support | Support staff during standard business hours, Online help center, getting started guides and videos, Curated knowledge base | — |
| Founded | — | 2015 |
| Headquarters | — | Mountain View, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series C |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses, including start-ups and organizations with low-volume hiring needs | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. |
Plans side by side
ApplicantStack
Starter$29.99per month
Growth$49.99per month
Recruit$109.99per month
Bundle$159.99per month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ApplicantStack
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ApplicantStack vs hireEZ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/applicantstack-vs-hireez, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.