ApplicantStackThe affordable, easy-to-use online applicant tracking system and employee onboarding system.
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
ApplicantStack vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 1.4 for ApplicantStack, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose ApplicantStack if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29.99 vs $149)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 1.4)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ApplicantStack | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #49 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ApplicantStack 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApplicantStackLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1ApplicantStack ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | ApplicantStack | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| How much does a recruiting platform cost per month? | AI Mode | #2 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ApplicantStack | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $29.99 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Online, with no software installation required | — |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Support | Support staff during standard business hours, Online help center, getting started guides and videos, Curated knowledge base | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses, including start-ups and organizations with low-volume hiring needs | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
ApplicantStack
Starter$29.99per month
Growth$49.99per month
Recruit$109.99per month
Bundle$159.99per month
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ApplicantStack
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ApplicantStack vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/applicantstack-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.