AppSheetBuild apps with no code
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
AppSheet vs Claris FileMaker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27017 coverage
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 1.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AppSheet leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppSheetClaris FileMaker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AppSheet ranked higher
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums |
| Founded | — | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | Sunnyvale, California |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | Later Stage VC · $1M raised |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.