AppSheet vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (26% vs 13% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AppSheet leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AppSheet | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #8 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | — | 1999 |
| Headquarters | — | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | Funding round |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.