Quickbase vs Retool
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Retool is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 29.9 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Choose Retool if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.9 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 13% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Quickbase | Retool |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 29.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.4% | down−4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #25 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 7.8% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 46 |
| Positive in AI answers | 13% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp · Retool −4pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Retool leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Quickbase | Retool |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #6 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #9 | #4 |
| How much does a low-code platform cost per month? | ChatGPT | #5 | #2 |
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #4 | #6 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #12 | #11 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | AI Mode | #7 | #8 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #13 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Quickbase | Retool |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Retool Cloud, self-hosted, or air-gapped |
| Integrations | 40+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
| Support | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence | — |
| Founded | 1999 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Funding round | Series C2 · $141M raised |
| Best for | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. | Enterprises and business teams that want to build internal tools with AI while IT keeps governance, security review and audit trails. |
Plans side by side
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Retool
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Retool
- Excellent for internal tools, admin panels, and dashboards
- Developer-first low-code platform
- Transparent, inexpensive pricing
- High developer satisfaction ratings
- Rapid assembly of internal tools
- Pricing rises as builders and users increase
- Overkill for simple apps or lightweight needs
- Free plan limits on users, workflow runs, and storage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Quickbase vs Retool”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/quickbase-vs-retool, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.