Microsoft Power Apps vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 13% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Microsoft Power Apps | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 55.6% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.2% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #1 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 9.8% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 55 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Microsoft Power Apps | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #1 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #1 | #9 |
| How much does a low-code platform cost per month? | ChatGPT | #4 | #5 |
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #1 | #4 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #1 | #12 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | AI Mode | #1 | #7 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #1 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Microsoft Power Apps | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | — | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, Washington | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Funding round |
| Best for | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft Power Apps vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-power-apps-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.