Appsmith vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 1.3 for n8n, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 1.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
Choose n8n if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 48% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appsmith | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.6% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.9% | down−1.6% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #7 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · n8n −1.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appsmith | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #19 | #17 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appsmith | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Plans side by side
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-n8n, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.