Appsmith vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 2.4)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $25)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 38% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
Choose UiPath if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appsmith | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.6% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.9% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #7 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appsmith | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #6 | #5 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #16 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appsmith | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2019 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.