Augment CodeAgentic software development at organizational scale
vs
ClineAI Coding, Open Source and Open Choice
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Augment Code vs Cline
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cline is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 2.2 for Augment Code.
Choose Augment Code if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 54% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Cline if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 2.2)
- You want a free plan to start
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Cline |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 54% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Cline 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cline leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Augment CodeCline
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Augment Code ranked higher
0Cline ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Cline |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | Runs in your editor, terminal or own apps, with local or cloud AI models, and VPC deployments on Enterprise. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | — |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | Community support for the open-source version, Priority and dedicated support on Enterprise, SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2022 | — |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | Seed · $32M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | Individual developers and teams who want an open-source agent with their own provider keys, and organizations that need SSO, audit logs and team management on Enterprise. |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Standard$20month flat, no per-seat charge
Business$100month flat, no per-seat charge
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Cline
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
- Granular model control and choice of models
- Reliable handling of large codebase modifications
- Free, flexible setup
- Fits strict privacy and compliance needs with approved models
- Team must pay model-token API costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Cline”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-cline, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.