Augment Code vs Looker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 8.3 versus 2.2 for Augment Code, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Augment Code if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 30% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.3 vs 2.2)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Looker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 8.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 3.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 30% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Looker 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Augment Code | Looker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI coding assistant vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #11 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Looker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | Google Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | — |
| Founded | 2022 | — |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | Series E · $280M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | — |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Looker
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Looker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-looker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.