Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 2.2 for Augment Code, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Augment Code if…
- You want a lower entry price ($20 vs $16,000)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 2.2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Augment Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #6 | #5 |
| Which AI coding assistant has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #6 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Founded | 2022 | — |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.