Authentik vs Ping Identity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ping Identity is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 22.5 versus 2.7 for Authentik.
Choose Authentik if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 36% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
Choose Ping Identity if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.5 vs 2.7)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 22.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | down−2.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 7.5% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Ping Identity −4.699999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ping Identity leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Multi-tenant cloud, dedicated-tenant cloud, self-managed on-premises, hybrid, and FedRAMP-authorized environments |
| Integrations | — | 350+ |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | — |
| Founded | 2018 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | — | Denver, CO, United States |
| Employees | 1–10 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Acquisition by Thoma Bravo (take-private) |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Ping Identity
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Ping Identity
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
- Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
- Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
- Highly rated by analysts and users
- Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Ping Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-ping-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.