AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
SaviyntSecure every identity - Human, machine, AI agent.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Authentik vs Saviynt
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Saviynt is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.1 versus 2.7 for Authentik.
Choose Authentik if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 30% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
Choose Saviynt if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.1 vs 2.7)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or FedRAMP or PCI DSS or IRAP or Cyber Essentials Plus or EU-US DPF or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong identity governance and compliance capabilities
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 5.1% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | up+1.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 30% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Saviynt +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Saviynt leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AuthentikSaviynt
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Authentik ranked higher
0Saviynt ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, IRAP, Cyber Essentials Plus, EU-US DPF, FIPS 140-3 |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Customer Support, Knowledge Exchange, Saviynt University |
| Founded | 2018 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | — | El Segundo, California, United States |
| Employees | 1–10 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Series B extension (unconfirmed) |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Large enterprises and government institutions that need to govern workforce, external, privileged, non-human and AI agent identities in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
Saviynt
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Saviynt
- Strong identity governance and compliance capabilities
- Highly rated by Gartner Peer Insights and KuppingerCole
- Suited to large, complex enterprise environments
- Good for cloud governance
- Strong access certification and segregation of duties controls
- Heavyweight platform with higher cost profile
- Enterprise contracts are typically annual or multi-year
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Saviynt”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-saviynt, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.