Skip to content
SlateIndex
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
vs
SaviyntSecure every identity - Human, machine, AI agent.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Okta vs Saviynt

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 5.1 for Saviynt, and ranks ahead in 93% of the answers that name both.

Choose Okta if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 5.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 30% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27018 or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose Saviynt if…

  • You need SOC 1 Type II or FedRAMP or PCI DSS or IRAP or Cyber Essentials Plus or EU-US DPF or FIPS 140-3 coverage
  • Strong identity governance and compliance capabilities
  • Highly rated by Gartner Peer Insights and KuppingerCole
  • Suited to large, complex enterprise environments

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Okta Saviynt
Visibility score56.9%5.1%
Change vs last weekdown−0.9%up+1.1%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#2#18
Share of voice12.2%2.5%
Mentions this run388
Positive in AI answers39%30%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Okta 57%

Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · Saviynt +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
68.4%
12.5%
AI Mode
60%
3.3%
Perplexity
53.9%
6.8%
OktaSaviynt

Head to head in AI answers

14 engine answers name both brands

13Okta ranked higher
1Saviynt ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOktaSaviynt
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry price$6 per seat / mo—
Free planNo · 30-day trial—
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)Cloud (SaaS)
Integrations8000+—
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, IRAP, Cyber Essentials Plus, EU-US DPF, FIPS 140-3
SupportOnline support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success PlansCustomer Support, Knowledge Exchange, Saviynt University
Founded20092010
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesEl Segundo, California, United States
Employees5,000+1,001–5,000
FundingIPOSeries B extension (unconfirmed)
Best forOrganizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.Large enterprises and government institutions that need to govern workforce, external, privileged, non-human and AI agent identities in one platform.

Plans side by side

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

Saviynt

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Okta

  • Market-leading IAM platform
  • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
  • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
  • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
  • Strong security effectiveness

    Saviynt

    • Strong identity governance and compliance capabilities
    • Highly rated by Gartner Peer Insights and KuppingerCole
    • Suited to large, complex enterprise environments
    • Good for cloud governance
    • Strong access certification and segregation of duties controls
    • Heavyweight platform with higher cost profile
    • Enterprise contracts are typically annual or multi-year

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs Saviynt”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-saviynt, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.