Authentik vs ZITADEL
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Authentik is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 2.7 versus 1.3 for ZITADEL, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Authentik if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.7 vs 1.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $100)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose ZITADEL if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 67% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (11–50 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | up+0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 83% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Authentik leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Authentik | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | AI Mode | #1 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $100 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Cloud and self-hosted |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Discord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1–10 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Series A · $16M raised |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Developers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps. |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
ZITADEL
- Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
- Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
- Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
- Good for developer-focused IAM
- Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.