Skip to content
SlateIndex
AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
ZITADELIdentity infrastructure, simplified for you.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Authentik vs ZITADEL

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Authentik is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 2.7 versus 1.3 for ZITADEL, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Authentik if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.7 vs 1.3)
  • You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $100)
  • You need OpenID Certified coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

Choose ZITADEL if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 67% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (11–50 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Authentik ZITADEL
Visibility score2.7%1.3%
Change vs last weekup+1.7%up+0.5%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#24#27
Share of voice0.6%0.4%
Mentions this run21
Positive in AI answers67%83%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Authentik 3%

Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Authentik leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.7%
3.9%
AI Mode
3.7%
2.6%
Perplexity
1.7%
0%
AuthentikZITADEL

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Authentik ranked higher
0ZITADEL ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAuthentikZITADEL
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $5 per seat / moFree; paid from $100 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentSelf-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offeredCloud and self-hosted
ComplianceOpenID CertifiedISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II
SupportCommunity Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus)Discord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise)
Founded20182020
Headquarters—San Francisco, CA, United States
Employees1–1011–50
FundingLater-stage VC · $2M raisedSeries A · $16M raised
Best forOrganizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users.Developers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps.

Plans side by side

Authentik

Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
Authentik pricing

ZITADEL

Free$0month
Pro$100month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
ZITADEL pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Authentik

  • fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
  • modern UI
  • easy to administer
  • affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
  • highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
  • you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself

ZITADEL

  • Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
  • Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
  • Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
  • Good for developer-focused IAM
  • Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.