AWSVisual low-code tool for building AWS-backed apps from Figma designs
vs
KeycloakOpen source identity and access management
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
AWS vs Keycloak
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AWS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 14.1 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose AWS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.1 vs 5.6)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS Level 1 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
- Enterprise-grade reliability and uptime on AWS infrastructure
Choose Keycloak if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 16% positive)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AWS | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.1% | 5.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #9 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 5.1% | 2.1% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 16% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AWS +14.1pp · Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AWS leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AWSKeycloak
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0AWS ranked higher
1Keycloak ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | AWS | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #9 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AWS | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, PCI DSS Level 1, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, ISO 9001, ISO 27001 | — |
| Support | — | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak |
| Founded | 2021 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | — |
| Employees | 5,000+ | — |
| Best for | — | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AWS
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
- Enterprise-grade reliability and uptime on AWS infrastructure
- Pay-as-you-go, usage-based pricing
- Deep integration with the AWS ecosystem and AI tools
- Recognised by analysts such as Gartner and ISG
- Requires strong AWS engineering or technical expertise
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS vs Keycloak”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-vs-keycloak, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.