BeyondTrustPrivileged access management and identity security software
vs
DescopeDrag & drop customer and agentic IAM for apps, AI agents and MCP servers.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
BeyondTrust vs Descope
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Descope is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.9 for BeyondTrust.
Choose BeyondTrust if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or DoD IL5 or FedRAMP Moderate or TX-RAMP Level 2 or FIPS 140-3 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Broad privileged access management capabilities
Choose Descope if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (62% vs 23% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or HIPAA coverage
- Low-code option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | BeyondTrust | Descope |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #30 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 23% | 62% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
BeyondTrust −1.9pp · Descope −2pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Descope leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BeyondTrustDescope
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0BeyondTrust ranked higher
0Descope ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | BeyondTrust | Descope |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $249 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS or self-hosted appliance | Cloud SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, DoD IL5, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, TX-RAMP Level 2, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS, GDPR | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High |
| Support | — | Community support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineer |
| Founded | — | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Johns Creek, Georgia | Los Altos, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Debt loan | Seed extension · $88M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises and government agencies needing privileged access management | Startups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers. |
Plans side by side
BeyondTrust
Pricing not available.
Descope
Free Forever$0month
Pro$249month, billed annually
Growth$799month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
BeyondTrust
- Broad privileged access management capabilities
- Endpoint privilege capabilities
- Strong administrator and privileged-account controls
- Rated Innovative by ISG
Descope
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
- Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “BeyondTrust vs Descope”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/beyondtrust-vs-descope, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.