Skip to content
SlateIndex
BeyondTrustPrivileged access management and identity security software
vs
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

BeyondTrust vs CyberArk

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 0.9 for BeyondTrust, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose BeyondTrust if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or DoD IL5 or FedRAMP Moderate or TX-RAMP Level 2 or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS coverage
  • Broad privileged access management capabilities
  • Endpoint privilege capabilities

Choose CyberArk if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 0.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 23% positive)
  • You need SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or CCPA coverage
  • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric BeyondTrust CyberArk
Visibility score0.9%15.6%
Change vs last weekdown−0.6%up+2.1%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#30#7
Share of voice0.6%6.1%
Mentions this run219
Positive in AI answers23%49%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3BeyondTrust 1%

BeyondTrust −1.9pp · CyberArk +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.9%
17.5%
AI Mode
0%
16.5%
Perplexity
1.9%
14.6%
BeyondTrustCyberArk

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

0BeyondTrust ranked higher
5CyberArk ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionBeyondTrustCyberArk
DeploymentSaaS or self-hosted applianceSelf-hosted and SaaS
ComplianceSOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, DoD IL5, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, TX-RAMP Level 2, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS, GDPRSOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA
Support—Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community
Founded—1999
HeadquartersJohns Creek, GeorgiaNewton, MA, United States
Employees1,001–5,0001,001–5,000
FundingDebt loanPost-IPO debt
Best forEnterprises and government agencies needing privileged access managementEnterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

BeyondTrust

  • Broad privileged access management capabilities
  • Endpoint privilege capabilities
  • Strong administrator and privileged-account controls
  • Rated Innovative by ISG

    CyberArk

    • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
    • Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
    • Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
    • Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
    • Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “BeyondTrust vs CyberArk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/beyondtrust-vs-cyberark, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.