BeyondTrust vs Ping Identity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ping Identity is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 22.5 versus 0.9 for BeyondTrust, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose BeyondTrust if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or DoD IL5 or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or TX-RAMP Level 2 or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS or GDPR coverage
- Broad privileged access management capabilities
- Endpoint privilege capabilities
- Strong administrator and privileged-account controls
Choose Ping Identity if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.5 vs 0.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 23% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | BeyondTrust | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 22.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−2.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #30 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 7.5% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 23% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
BeyondTrust −1.9pp · Ping Identity −4.699999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ping Identity leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | BeyondTrust | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is the difference between a identity and access management platform and a privileged access management tool? | ChatGPT | #6 | #4 |
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #11 | #3 |
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #10 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | BeyondTrust | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | SaaS or self-hosted appliance | Multi-tenant cloud, dedicated-tenant cloud, self-managed on-premises, hybrid, and FedRAMP-authorized environments |
| Integrations | — | 350+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, DoD IL5, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, TX-RAMP Level 2, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS, GDPR | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Founded | — | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Johns Creek, Georgia | Denver, CO, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Debt loan | Acquisition by Thoma Bravo (take-private) |
| Best for | Enterprises and government agencies needing privileged access management | Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
BeyondTrust
- Broad privileged access management capabilities
- Endpoint privilege capabilities
- Strong administrator and privileged-account controls
- Rated Innovative by ISG
Ping Identity
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
- Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
- Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
- Highly rated by analysts and users
- Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “BeyondTrust vs Ping Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/beyondtrust-vs-ping-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.