Bolt.newBuild stunning apps & websites, just by prompting.
vs
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Bolt.new vs Cursor
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 0 for Bolt.new.
Choose Bolt.new if…
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 0)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bolt.new | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 67.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #38 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 13.6% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 65 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 53% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bolt.new 0pp · Cursor 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Bolt.newCursor
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Bolt.new ranked higher
0Cursor ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bolt.new | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Community, Email, Priority support on Pro and Teams, 24/7 priority support on Enterprise | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series B · $135M raised | Funding round at $9.9B valuation |
| Best for | Entrepreneurs, small businesses, product managers, marketers, agencies and students who want to build apps or websites by prompting | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. |
Plans side by side
Bolt.new
Free$0month
Pro$25month
Teams$30per member per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual contract
Cursor
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bolt.new
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bolt.new vs Cursor”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bolt-new-vs-cursor, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.