Bolt.newBuild stunning apps & websites, just by prompting.
vs
MendixOne platform to build the workflows, agents and applications your hybrid workforce runs on.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Bolt.new vs Mendix
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mendix is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 33.1 versus 0.3 for Bolt.new.
Choose Bolt.new if…
- You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $1,090)
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Choose Mendix if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (33.1 vs 0.3)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 22301 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO 9001 or PCI DSS Level 1 service provider or NEN 7510 or FedRAMP (Mendix Cloud for US Government) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex applications
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bolt.new | Mendix |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 33.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+1.6% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #43 | #3 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 7.8% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 45 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bolt.new +0.3pp · Mendix +1.6000000000000014pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mendix leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Bolt.newMendix
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Bolt.new ranked higher
0Mendix ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bolt.new | Mendix |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | Free; paid from $1,090 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Public cloud, private cloud or air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 22301, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO 9001, PCI DSS Level 1 service provider, NEN 7510, FedRAMP (Mendix Cloud for US Government) |
| Support | Community, Email, Priority support on Pro and Teams, 24/7 priority support on Enterprise | Free Online Academy with learning paths and certifications, Standard support plan, 9 AM to 5 PM, Premium support plan, 24/7, Expert Services for onboarding and scaling |
| Founded | 2017 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B · $135M raised | Funding round (no lead investor or valuation given) · $38M raised |
| Best for | Entrepreneurs, small businesses, product managers, marketers, agencies and students who want to build apps or websites by prompting | Enterprises building department-wide business applications and mission-critical core systems |
Plans side by side
Bolt.new
Free$0month
Pro$25month
Teams$30per member per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual contract
Mendix
Free$0month
Standard (One App)$1,090month (starting at)
Standard (Unlimited Apps)$2,725month (starting at)
PremiumCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bolt.new
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Mendix
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex applications
- Strong model-driven, high-productivity development
- Cloud-native, multi-experience development
- Bridges citizen developers and professional developers
- Strong for enterprise and industrial application development
- Costs less predictable due to infrastructure and add-ons
- Free plan limited to one app with production and scaling limits
- Enterprise tiers can be expensive, starting around $1,090 per month
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bolt.new vs Mendix”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bolt-new-vs-mendix, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.