Budibase vs Microsoft Power Apps
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 5.2 for Budibase, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.
Choose Budibase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 44% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 5.2)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 55.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | up+0.2% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 9.8% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Budibase | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | AI Mode | #4 | #1 |
| Best low-code platform for startups | Perplexity | #8 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | AI Mode | #7 | #1 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #11 | #1 |
| Is there a free low-code platform for small teams? | AI Mode | #2 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community |
| Founded | 2019 | — |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Redmond, Washington |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | — |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Microsoft Power Apps
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs Microsoft Power Apps”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-microsoft-power-apps, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.