Skip to content
SlateIndex
BudibaseBuild AI agents, chat and automate internal workflows instantly.
vs
RetoolBuild internal software better, with AI.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Budibase vs Retool

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Retool is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 29.9 versus 5.2 for Budibase, and ranks ahead in 78% of the answers that name both.

Choose Budibase if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 41% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • open-source, self-hosted deployment

Choose Retool if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.9 vs 5.2)
  • You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $19)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Budibase Retool
Visibility score5.2%29.9%
Change vs last weekdown−0.5%down−4%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#20#4
Share of voice1.6%7.8%
Mentions this run946
Positive in AI answers67%41%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Budibase 5%

Budibase −0.5pp · Retool −4pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Retool leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.6%
34.3%
AI Mode
6.3%
22.4%
Perplexity
1.9%
33%
BudibaseRetool

Head to head in AI answers

9 engine answers name both brands

2Budibase ranked higher
7Retool ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionBudibaseRetool
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $19 / moFree; paid from $10 per seat / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentSelf-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase CloudRetool Cloud, self-hosted, or air-gapped
ComplianceISO 27001SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022
SupportCommunity forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise—
Founded20192017
HeadquartersBelfast, Northern IrelandSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raisedSeries C2 · $141M raised
Best forIT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host.Enterprises and business teams that want to build internal tools with AI while IT keeps governance, security review and audit trails.

Plans side by side

Budibase

Pro$19month
Premium$49month
Business$299month
Enterprise (Cloud)Customcustom
Open source$0free (self-host)
Enterprise (Self-host)Customcustom
Budibase pricing

Retool

Free$0month per builder
Team$10month per builder, billed annually
Business$50month per builder, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Retool pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Budibase

  • open-source, self-hosted deployment
  • avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
  • transparent, predictable pricing
  • free with no user limit
  • low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards

    Retool

    • Excellent for internal tools, admin panels, and dashboards
    • Developer-first low-code platform
    • Transparent, inexpensive pricing
    • High developer satisfaction ratings
    • Rapid assembly of internal tools
    • Pricing rises as builders and users increase
    • Overkill for simple apps or lightweight needs
    • Free plan limits on users, workflow runs, and storage

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs Retool”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-retool, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.