Appsmith vs Budibase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 5.2 for Budibase, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 5.2)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $19)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Budibase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 48% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appsmith | Budibase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.6% | 5.2% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.9% | down−0.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #7 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · Budibase −0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appsmith | Budibase |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | AI Mode | #3 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | ChatGPT | #4 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | AI Mode | #6 | #7 |
| Most affordable low-code platform that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #3 | #7 |
| Is there a free low-code platform for small teams? | ChatGPT | #1 | #2 |
| Is there a free low-code platform for small teams? | AI Mode | #1 | #2 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | ChatGPT | #1 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appsmith | Budibase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Belfast, Northern Ireland |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs Budibase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-budibase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.