Budibase vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 5.2 for Budibase, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.
Choose Budibase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 42% positive)
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 5.2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 40.2% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | down−2.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 8.2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 47 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Budibase | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | ChatGPT | #6 | #1 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | AI Mode | #7 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #11 | #2 |
| Most affordable low-code platform that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #7 | #4 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | ChatGPT | #4 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | — |
| Founded | 2019 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
Budibase
OutSystems
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.